top of page

THIS DIGITAL ARTIFACT IS A STUDENT ASSIGNMENT FOR ETEC 512 IN THE UBC MET PROGRAM AND WILL BE MONITORED FOR COMMENTS BETWEEN MARCH 21 AND APRIL 1, 2022

Head to the Take a Break page when you need some interactive fun.

tamaka8

Cognitivism- Teaching and Instructional Design (ID)

Updated: Mar 20, 2022

3 minute read



Instructional design and Technology professionals (IDT) are responsible for "the theory and practice of design, development, utilization, management and evaluation of processes and resources for learning" (Amirault, R., 2015). It's necessary to have an understanding of learning theories to choose the appropriate theory to underpin the the teaching and materials design for a specific lesson. Instructional designers play the roles of "analyst, evaluator, e-learning specialist, and project manager (Richey, Fields, & Foxon, 2001).


Ertmer & Newby (2013) propose three cognitive points for the teacher and instructional designer to consider:

  1. Each student brings a unique learning history to the classroom which can affect learning outcomes,

  2. What construct and framework of new data will link to the student's current experiences, expertise, and abilities, and

  3. How to organize learning experiences with feedback to enable the student to assimilate and/or accommodate the new information within the learner's mind .

What do learners know and how do they know it

​​

Cognitivism is concerned with how data is acquired, catalogued, stored, and retrieved from the mind (Ertmer & Newby, 2013, p 51).


Memory, transfer, and retrieval

Schunk (2012) contends that "cognitive theories place greater emphasis on presenting material such that learners can organize it, relate it to what they know, and remember it in a meaningful fashion."


Transfer happens when a student is able to apply the knowledge they have learned to different situations. Schunk (2012) explains that students' assimilation is key to understanding. Instructors can support transfer by providing information about how this data can be used in alternate settings (Schunk, 2012).


Design Principles


Ertmer & Newby (2013) suggest the following cognitive instructional design principles have a direct impact on student learning:

  • Involving the learner in the learning process

  • Using ranking analyses to uncover essential connections

  • Organizing data to support cognitive processing, and

  • Developing learning conditions that support students to make associations with prior learning.

Cognitive Strategies


Ertmer & Newby (2013) provide the following tips for cognitive teaching and instructional design:

"Advance organizers

Analogies and metaphors

Cognitive task analysis procedures

Concept mapping

Demonstrations

Environmental cues

Framing

Illustrative examples

Instructional explanations

Matched non-examples

Mnemonics

Outlining, and

Practice with corrective feedback."


Conclusion


Cognition is an important consideration for teachers and instructional designers as the presentation of material has a great impact on active learner engagement, which in turn affects the assimilation of material within existing knowledge and real experience. Each learner brings a unique history to the classroom that is enhanced by intentional learning design strategies to support the successful acquisition, cataloguing, storing, and retrieval of information from the mind (Ertmer & Newby, 2013).


Additional resources



The most common instructional design framework is ADDIE (Sharif & Cho, 2015). ADDIE may also be viewed as a systematic approach.


Comments are gratefully received at the bottom of the page.


References


Amirault, R. J. (2015). Technology transience and the challenge it poses to higher education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(2), 1-17.


Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143


Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Eric.


Sharif, A., & Cho, S. (2015). 21st-century instructional designers: Bridging the perceptual gaps between identity, practice, impact and professional development. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12(3), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2176


Schunk, D. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.







49 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page